Paywall Reader | Read without paywalls for free vs. archive.is
Paywall Reader | Read without paywalls for free
Bypass paywalls effortlessly with the Paywall Reader, accessing articles and content for free and without restrictions.
archive.is
Archive.is works on most websites - for examples Financial Times, The Economist, Medium etc. It's easy to use but sometimes takes a long time to load.
| Item | Votes | Upvote |
|---|---|---|
| fast | 1 | |
| lightweight | 1 | |
| minimalist | 1 |
| Item | Votes | Upvote |
|---|---|---|
| No cons yet, would you like to add one? | ||
| Item | Votes | Upvote |
|---|---|---|
| Easy to use | 1 | |
| Reliable | 1 | |
| Works on most major sites | 1 |
| Item | Votes | Upvote |
|---|---|---|
| Can be slow | 1 | |
| Somewhat dated user interface | 1 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Paywall Reader is a tool that allows users to bypass paywalls and access articles and content for free and without restrictions.
The pros of Paywall Reader include being fast, lightweight, and minimalist. There are currently no listed cons from users.
archive.is is a web archiving service that allows users to take snapshots of web pages. It works on most major websites, including Financial Times, The Economist, and Medium. Users find it easy to use, although it can sometimes take a long time to load.
Pros of archive.is include its ease of use, reliability, and compatibility with most major sites. However, some cons are that it can be slow to load and has a somewhat dated user interface.
Yes, archive.is is considered reliable by users. It successfully archives snapshots of web pages from various major websites.
archive.is works on most major websites, including Financial Times, The Economist, and Medium.
Yes, archive.is is easy to use. Users appreciate its straightforward interface, although some find it a bit dated.
archive.is can sometimes take a long time to load due to the process of capturing and storing a snapshot of a web page, which can be resource-intensive.
