Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution that supports single-sign-on and identity providers like Google, Facebook, and GitHub. It is well-suited for organizations looking for an open-source and customizable solution. On the other hand, Stytch markets itself as a leading Auth0 alternative, offering a free starter plan with up to 25 organizations and 1000 members, with additional users costing $0.05 per monthly active user. The choice between Keycloak and Stytch would depend on whether you prioritize an open-source platform with customizable options or a cost-effective commercial solution with a free tier for smaller-scale use.

Stytch offers a free starter plan that supports up to 25 organizations and 1000 members, with additional users costing $0.05 per monthly active user. Keycloak, being an open source solution, does not have a licensing cost but may incur costs related to deployment, maintenance, and customization. Therefore, if upfront costs and scalability are your primary concerns, Stytch might offer a more cost-effective plan, especially for smaller organizations.

Stytch markets itself as the leading Auth0 alternative. It offers a free starter plan that supports up to 25 organizations and 1000 members. Additional users cost $0.05 per monthly active user.

Stytch provides a free starter plan for up to 25 organizations and 1000 members. For additional users, the cost is $0.05 per monthly active user. It positions itself as a strong alternative to Auth0.

Currently, there are no user-generated pros and cons for Stytch. However, it is notable that Stytch offers a free starter plan and competitive pricing for additional users.

Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It supports single-sign-on and integrates with OpenID Connect or SAML 2.0 Identity Providers such as Google, Facebook, and GitHub.

Keycloak offers several features including single-sign-on, identity brokering and social login, user federation, client adapters, and an admin console. It supports standard protocols like OpenID Connect and SAML 2.0.

Currently, there are no user-generated pros and cons for Keycloak. However, some general pros include its open source nature and extensive protocol support. Potential cons may include a steep learning curve for new users.

Organizations that require robust identity and access management solutions can benefit from Keycloak. It is particularly useful for companies needing to implement single-sign-on across multiple applications.