PaywallBuster vs. archive.is
PaywallBuster
paywallbuster.comPaywallBuster offers a seamless paywall bypass experience, allowing users to paste the URL of desired content into a blank field and try various paywall removal tools
archive.is
archive.is/Archive.is works on most websites - for examples Financial Times, The Economist, Medium etc. It's easy to use but sometimes takes a long time to load.
Pros
- Seamless Bypass× 1
- Cross-Device Compatibility× 1
- Ethical Usage× 1
Cons
Pros
- Easy to use× 1
- Reliable× 1
- Works on most major sites× 1
Cons
- Can be slow× 1
- Somewhat dated user interface× 1
Frequently Asked Questions
PaywallBuster is a tool that offers a seamless paywall bypass experience. Users can paste the URL of the desired content into a blank field and try various paywall removal tools.
Pros of PaywallBuster include its seamless bypass capability, cross-device compatibility, and ethical usage. Currently, there are no listed cons.
archive.is is a web archiving service that allows users to take snapshots of web pages. It works on most major websites, including Financial Times, The Economist, and Medium. Users find it easy to use, although it can sometimes take a long time to load.
Pros of archive.is include its ease of use, reliability, and compatibility with most major sites. However, some cons are that it can be slow to load and has a somewhat dated user interface.
Yes, archive.is is considered reliable by users. It successfully archives snapshots of web pages from various major websites.
archive.is works on most major websites, including Financial Times, The Economist, and Medium.
Yes, archive.is is easy to use. Users appreciate its straightforward interface, although some find it a bit dated.
archive.is can sometimes take a long time to load due to the process of capturing and storing a snapshot of a web page, which can be resource-intensive.
