Lucia Auth vs. Keycloak
Lucia Auth
lucia-auth.com/Lucia is an open source auth library that abstracts away the complexity of handling sessions. It works with any JS runtime - Node.js, Bun, Deno, Cloudflare Workers. It's also fully typed. It integrates with MongoDB. PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, and with their respective ORMs and query builders.
Keycloak
www.keycloak.org/Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It supports Keycloak single-sign-on and OpenID Connect or SAML 2.0 Identity Providers (Google, Facebook, GitHub etc).
Pros
- Open source× 1
- Fully typed× 1
- Work with any JS runtime× 1
Cons
Pros
Cons
Frequently Asked Questions
Keycloak and Lucia Auth serve different needs in the realm of user authentication. Keycloak is a comprehensive identity and access management solution that supports single sign-on (SSO) and integrates with various identity providers like Google, Facebook, and GitHub. This makes it ideal for applications requiring robust, enterprise-level features. On the other hand, Lucia Auth is an open-source authentication library that is fully typed and works with any JavaScript runtime, including Node.js, Bun, Deno, and Cloudflare Workers. It also integrates well with databases like MongoDB, PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite. Lucia Auth is better suited for developers looking for a flexible, developer-friendly solution that can be easily integrated into different environments. The choice between the two depends on your specific requirements: enterprise-level identity management versus flexible, runtime-agnostic authentication.
Lucia Auth offers versatility by being fully typed and compatible with various JavaScript runtimes such as Node.js, Bun, Deno, and Cloudflare Workers. It also integrates with multiple databases including MongoDB, PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite, making it highly adaptable for different development environments. Keycloak, while being a robust identity and access management solution, is more focused on providing comprehensive features like single sign-on (SSO) and integration with identity providers like Google, Facebook, and GitHub. If your project requires a versatile, developer-friendly authentication library, Lucia Auth might be a better fit. However, if you need a solution with extensive identity management capabilities, Keycloak could be the better option.
Lucia Auth is an open-source authentication library designed to simplify session management. It supports various JavaScript runtimes, including Node.js, Bun, Deno, and Cloudflare Workers, and is fully typed. The library integrates with databases such as MongoDB, PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite, as well as their respective ORMs and query builders.
Pros of using Lucia Auth include being open source, fully typed, and its compatibility with any JavaScript runtime. As of now, there are no user-generated cons listed for Lucia Auth.
Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It supports single-sign-on and integrates with OpenID Connect or SAML 2.0 Identity Providers such as Google, Facebook, and GitHub.
Keycloak offers several features including single-sign-on, identity brokering and social login, user federation, client adapters, and an admin console. It supports standard protocols like OpenID Connect and SAML 2.0.
Currently, there are no user-generated pros and cons for Keycloak. However, some general pros include its open source nature and extensive protocol support. Potential cons may include a steep learning curve for new users.
Organizations that require robust identity and access management solutions can benefit from Keycloak. It is particularly useful for companies needing to implement single-sign-on across multiple applications.