Okta vs. Auth0 by Okta
Okta
www.okta.com/Okta is an identity provider for organizations. It offers enterprise solutions for managing workforce and employee identities. It's HIPAA BAA and PCI compliant.
Auth0 by Okta
auth0.com/Auth0 is Okta's B2C identity management solution. It's an all-in-one package, with social login, bot detection, UI components, anonymous users, single-sign-on, MFA etc. The free tier comes with 7,500 MAUs. That said, it's relatively expensive and 20,000 MAUs will cost you $1400/month.
Pros
Cons
Pros
- Offers passwordless, social, and multifactor auth× 1
- Extensive documentation and community support× 1
- Breach detection and brute-force protection× 1
Cons
- Free tier has restrictions on active users and features× 1
- Higher tiers can be expensive× 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Auth0 by Okta is specifically designed for B2C (business to consumer) identity management, offering features such as social login, bot detection, UI components, anonymous users, single-sign-on, and multi-factor authentication (MFA). It also has a free tier for up to 7,500 monthly active users (MAUs). On the other hand, Okta is more focused on enterprise solutions for managing workforce and employee identities, making it more suitable for B2B (business to business) scenarios. Therefore, Auth0 by Okta is generally a better choice for B2C identity management.
Auth0 by Okta offers a free tier for up to 7,500 monthly active users (MAUs), making it a more cost-effective solution for small startups in need of B2C identity management. However, it can become relatively expensive as the number of users increases, with a cost of $1400 per month for 20,000 MAUs. Okta, being more enterprise-focused, does not offer a similarly generous free tier for B2C scenarios, making Auth0 by Okta the more cost-effective option for small startups initially.
Both Auth0 by Okta and Okta are highly scalable solutions, but they serve different purposes. Auth0 by Okta is designed to scale with consumer-facing applications, offering features like social login and multi-factor authentication. Okta, on the other hand, is tailored for enterprise environments, providing robust workforce and employee identity management. The scalability of each solution depends on the specific use case: Auth0 by Okta for B2C applications and Okta for enterprise B2B scenarios.
Okta is an identity provider for organizations, offering enterprise solutions for managing workforce and employee identities. It is HIPAA BAA and PCI compliant, ensuring a high level of security and regulatory compliance.
Okta provides robust identity management services, including single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and API access management. It is designed to integrate seamlessly with various applications and services, enhancing security and user experience.
Yes, Okta is compliant with several regulatory standards, including HIPAA BAA and PCI. This ensures that it meets stringent security and privacy requirements, making it suitable for use in highly regulated industries.
Okta is commonly used across various industries, including healthcare, finance, technology, education, and government. Its compliance with regulatory standards and robust security features make it a preferred choice for organizations that require stringent identity management solutions.
Auth0 by Okta is a B2C identity management solution that offers an all-in-one package including social login, bot detection, UI components, anonymous users, single-sign-on (SSO), and multi-factor authentication (MFA). The free tier includes 7,500 monthly active users (MAUs), but higher usage can become expensive, with 20,000 MAUs costing $1400 per month.
The main features of Auth0 by Okta include passwordless authentication, social login, multi-factor authentication (MFA), breach detection, brute-force protection, and extensive documentation and community support.
Pros of Auth0 by Okta include its support for passwordless, social, and multi-factor authentication, extensive documentation and community support, and built-in breach detection and brute-force protection. Cons include restrictions on active users and features in the free tier, and the higher cost of advanced tiers.