Ory and Keycloak serve different needs depending on your project's requirements. Ory is API-first with comprehensive support for various programming languages, making it a good choice for developers needing robust SDKs. It offers features like authentication, analytics, access control, and machine-to-machine authentication. However, it does not offer a free tier, with pricing starting at $29 per month. Keycloak, on the other hand, is an open-source solution providing single-sign-on and support for major identity providers like Google, Facebook, and GitHub. It might be more suitable for those who prefer an open-source tool without upfront costs. The choice depends on whether you prioritize a commercial solution with extensive SDKs or a free, open-source option.

Ory offers extensive support for major programming languages, including Dart, .NET, Elixir, Go, Java, JavaScript, PHP, Python, Ruby, and Rust. This makes it highly versatile for developers working across different tech stacks. Keycloak primarily focuses on providing identity and access management solutions and does not specifically highlight SDK support for multiple languages like Ory does. Therefore, Ory offers more extensive programming language support compared to Keycloak.

Ory is an API-first identity manager that offers services such as authentication, analytics, access control, and machine-to-machine authentication. It supports several programming languages with SDKs, including Dart, .NET, Elixir, Go, Java, JavaScript, PHP, Python, Ruby, and Rust.

Ory supports a wide range of programming languages with its SDKs, including Dart, .NET, Elixir, Go, Java, JavaScript, PHP, Python, Ruby, and Rust.

Ory does not offer a free tier. The pricing starts at $29 per month, which includes 1,000 daily active users (DAUs). For each additional 1,000 DAUs, it costs $30.

Ory provides a variety of services including authentication, analytics, access control, and machine-to-machine authentication.

Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It supports single-sign-on and integrates with OpenID Connect or SAML 2.0 Identity Providers such as Google, Facebook, and GitHub.

Keycloak offers several features including single-sign-on, identity brokering and social login, user federation, client adapters, and an admin console. It supports standard protocols like OpenID Connect and SAML 2.0.

Currently, there are no user-generated pros and cons for Keycloak. However, some general pros include its open source nature and extensive protocol support. Potential cons may include a steep learning curve for new users.

Organizations that require robust identity and access management solutions can benefit from Keycloak. It is particularly useful for companies needing to implement single-sign-on across multiple applications.