Kinde vs. Keycloak
Kinde
kinde.com/Kinde has a generous free plan with up to 10,500 MAU free of charge. Their Pro plan costs $25/month and the price for each additional MAU over 10,500 is $0.0175.
Keycloak
www.keycloak.org/Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It supports Keycloak single-sign-on and OpenID Connect or SAML 2.0 Identity Providers (Google, Facebook, GitHub etc).
Pros
Cons
Pros
Cons
Frequently Asked Questions
Keycloak and Kinde serve different needs when it comes to user authentication. Keycloak is an open-source solution, providing flexibility and control over your authentication setup. It supports single-sign-on and integration with various Identity Providers like Google, Facebook, and GitHub. On the other hand, Kinde offers a generous free plan, which can be very cost-effective for smaller businesses or startups, with up to 10,500 Monthly Active Users free of charge. The Pro plan is also affordable at $25/month with additional charges for extra MAUs. If you need a highly customizable solution and have the technical expertise to manage it, Keycloak might be a better choice. If cost is a significant factor and you prefer a more straightforward, managed solution, Kinde could be more suitable.
Kinde is a platform that offers a generous free plan with up to 10,500 monthly active users (MAU) at no charge. For those needing more, their Pro plan costs $25 per month, with an additional cost of $0.0175 per MAU over 10,500.
Kinde offers a free plan that includes up to 10,500 monthly active users (MAU) without any charge. Their Pro plan is priced at $25 per month, and for each additional MAU over 10,500, the cost is $0.0175.
Currently, there are no user-generated pros or cons for Kinde.
Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It supports single-sign-on and integrates with OpenID Connect or SAML 2.0 Identity Providers such as Google, Facebook, and GitHub.
Keycloak offers several features including single-sign-on, identity brokering and social login, user federation, client adapters, and an admin console. It supports standard protocols like OpenID Connect and SAML 2.0.
Currently, there are no user-generated pros and cons for Keycloak. However, some general pros include its open source nature and extensive protocol support. Potential cons may include a steep learning curve for new users.
Organizations that require robust identity and access management solutions can benefit from Keycloak. It is particularly useful for companies needing to implement single-sign-on across multiple applications.
Related Content & Alternatives
- 2
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
