Gluu Server vs. Keycloak
Gluu Server
Gluu offers various authentication solutions based on open-source software. There is a self-hosted solution, a managed solution, and a free fully open-source solution based on the Linux Foundation Janssen Project.
Keycloak
Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It supports Keycloak single-sign-on and OpenID Connect or SAML 2.0 Identity Providers (Google, Facebook, GitHub etc).
| Item | Votes | Upvote |
|---|---|---|
| No pros yet, would you like to add one? | ||
| Item | Votes | Upvote |
|---|---|---|
| No cons yet, would you like to add one? | ||
| Item | Votes | Upvote |
|---|---|---|
| No pros yet, would you like to add one? | ||
| Item | Votes | Upvote |
|---|---|---|
| No cons yet, would you like to add one? | ||
Frequently Asked Questions
Both Gluu Server and Keycloak are robust open-source authentication solutions, each with its own strengths. Gluu Server offers various options including a self-hosted, managed, and a fully open-source solution based on the Janssen Project. Keycloak, on the other hand, is known for its support of single-sign-on and various identity providers like Google, Facebook, and GitHub. The choice between the two depends on your specific needs: if you need a managed solution or more flexibility in hosting, Gluu Server may be the better option. If you require extensive support for identity providers and single-sign-on capabilities, Keycloak could be more suitable.
Both Gluu Server and Keycloak are designed to be scalable, but they achieve this in different ways. Gluu Server offers a range of deployment options, including self-hosted and managed solutions, which can be tailored to scale according to your needs. Keycloak is also highly scalable, with built-in support for clustering and high availability. The best choice for scalability will depend on your specific infrastructure and requirements. If you prefer a managed service that can adapt as you grow, Gluu Server might be more suitable. If you are comfortable managing your own clusters and require high availability, Keycloak is a strong contender.
Gluu Server is a platform that offers various authentication solutions based on open-source software. It includes a self-hosted solution, a managed solution, and a free fully open-source solution based on the Linux Foundation Janssen Project.
Gluu Server offers three types of authentication solutions: a self-hosted solution, a managed solution, and a free fully open-source solution based on the Linux Foundation Janssen Project.
Yes, Gluu Server provides a free fully open-source solution based on the Linux Foundation Janssen Project.
The Linux Foundation Janssen Project is an open-source initiative that Gluu Server uses for its free, fully open-source authentication solution.
As of now, there are no user-generated pros and cons available for Gluu Server.
Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It supports single-sign-on and integrates with OpenID Connect or SAML 2.0 Identity Providers such as Google, Facebook, and GitHub.
Keycloak offers several features including single-sign-on, identity brokering and social login, user federation, client adapters, and an admin console. It supports standard protocols like OpenID Connect and SAML 2.0.
Currently, there are no user-generated pros and cons for Keycloak. However, some general pros include its open source nature and extensive protocol support. Potential cons may include a steep learning curve for new users.
Organizations that require robust identity and access management solutions can benefit from Keycloak. It is particularly useful for companies needing to implement single-sign-on across multiple applications.
